June 27th, 2009

How To Use a Compressor: Understanding Dynamics

One of the hardest audio processors to understand is the compressor.  Even after several years of using compressors many of my students and readers still have lots of questions about how to dial in the sound that they are trying to get.  Compressors are in the Dynamics Processors family which also includes limiters, expanders, gates and noise reduction.  Dynamics processors work in the Amplitude Domain.  Compressors work on the amplitude of an audio signal, which is basically the loudness of the signal.  Look at a waveform view of an audio signal:

Graph of a Sine Wave with Amplitude and Frequency

Graph of a Sine Wave with Amplitude and Frequency

The vertical axis shows Amplitude, which in analog (electrical)  audio refers to the amount of voltage in an analog signal. When the wave is above the center line, then the voltage is positive and when the wave is below the line the voltage is negative. Audio (in the electrical analog sense)  is AC or Alternating Current which means the voltage goes from positive to negative and then back again. The further away from the center line, the higher the voltage and the louder the wave will sound.

The Dynamics of music is generally thought to be the differences between the loud parts of music and the quiet parts of the music.  The dynamics of audio includes all of the differences in amplitude along the waveform.  In most pop music, for instance, the loudest parts of the music are the snare drum hits, followed by the lead vocal, then the background music. Notice in the following image the red dots above the waveform.  They are marking the locations of the snare and kick drum hits in the music.

The red dots mark the locations of the snare and kick drum hits.

The red dots mark the locations of the snare and kick drum hits.

Notice that there is audio in between the loud hits as well, but that it just has a lower amplitude. Compressors and all dynamics-based effects work on the amplitude of the audio, to adjust and change the differences in voltage.  The loudest level in digital audio is 0 dB Full Scale or (0 dB FS) which means that anything above that level will be distorted or simply just an error.  We can’t change the loudest possible level, but we can change everything that is below that level.

What a compressor does:

A compressor attenuates (decreases amplitude) audio that is above a threshold by a ratio.  The attack time is how quickly the compressor starts to attenuate the signal after the threshold is exceeded and the release time is how quickly the compressor stops attenuating the signal when the audio drops below the threshold level.

Probably the most common use of a compressor is to make an audio signal sound louder without peaking out the signal and causing clipping and distortion.  In a nutshell, the loudest parts of the audio signal (the peaks) are made a little bit quieter so that all of the signal can be boosted by the amount that the peaks were attenuated.

May 4th, 2009

External Hard Drives for PC’s and Mac’s (FAT32)

I am a PC guy.  I think that it is the best platform that gives the most options for hardware and software.  I think Mac’s a great, but they’re way more expensive and they have always felt like toys to me.  They are the Nerf brand of computer.  Unfortunately most pro studios have Mac’s and I find that I need to use my external disks both in other people’s studios and in my own.  The only decent format that works in both is FAT32, but on both platforms FAT32 is NOT the file system of choice.

Windows machines really prefer NTFS, the NT File System which has many fewer limitations.  Mac has their own file system as well.  An important problem with the FAT32 file system is that the maximum size of a file is 4 GB. Windows won’t let you format a hard drive with FAT32 if the drive is a big modern drive.  In fact Windows XP will not format a drive bigger than 32 GB with FAT32.  This is a good example of a Windows-Style Suck-a-doodle-doo.  You need to format to Fat32 with a Mac, Linux or use a third-party tool to format on a Windows machine.  Windows will read and write to a larger FAT32 drive, but won’t allow you to create one.

For Windows, the easiest tool to download is Acronis’ True Image Home.  (http://www.acronis.com/homecomputing/download/trueimage/) They offer a free 15 day trial that will allow you to format large disks as FAT32.  Just go through the process for “Adding a drive…”

Acronis is a great back up software tool as well.  It allows you to create images of your system disk and incremental or differential backups as well.  I find that it better than Norton’s Ghost, but have found that it doesn’t handle hard disk failure on the destination drive very well.  Their support offerings are pretty good, but not fast.

March 28th, 2009

TASCAM’s GigaStudio Kills Your DAW

Prepare yourself.  This will be a rant.

Several years ago I purchased GigaStudio so that I could use Sonic Implants’ (now SoniVox) amazing sounding orchestral sample library.  The library cost about double what I paid for my first car in Bean-town. It was expensive and it was worth it.  GigaStudio however is a heaping pile of turds. When I installed GigaStudio 3 the first time, it prompted me to restart my computer at which point it destroyed the boot loader for the Windows XP operating system and prevents you from being able to boot using Safe Mode.  The drivers for TASCAM’s software are “special.”  Not WDM, not ASIO, just special.  I had to rip all of the PCI-based sound cards out of the machine, disconnect everything with a USB connector on it just to get it to boot.

Then I downloaded the updated version of their software.  I installed it and rebooted my computer again with a tremendous amount of anxiety. I then tried to start the software only to find that I would have to register it to get it to work for the first time.  I went to their horrid website and registered my software.  I then got a page that said that it would take 48 hours for them to send my registration code, but that GigaStudio would work for 10 days without registration. Not true. (You’re a lying sack of crap, You’re a lying, scheming, stinking, nasty sack of liquid crap! — Stephanie Miller)

So I basically gave up on the software and purchased GVI so that I could run the samples as a plugin.  It still really sucks. You can’t open the .GSP files that you saved your settings in with GVI. So I recently had to load up a bunch of old projects where I was using GigaStudio so I could remix a bunch of old hip-hop instrumentals. Sovivox, bless their hearts, does allow you to crossgrade you samples to Kontact 2 format for $500.  So you can fix the problem by throwing more money at the problem.

TASCAM’s GigaStudio and GVI really,  really suck and their support can bite me in the booty too.

Beware the GigaStudio…

March 13th, 2009

Preparing Beats and Instrumentals for a Vocal Session

I work with a bunch of hip-hop artists and a few R&B singers. Most of the time they bring their own instrumentals to the studio instead of having me write music for them. I usually charge $300 or so to write and produce instrumentals for artists and there are 3 zillion kids with FL Studio using the title producer that will put something together for free.

The problem with free beats is that most of the time the quality of the audio really sucks.  Most MC’s are downloading instrumentals off of the web or the beats are coming in over email.  These are always compressed files which lack accuracy and sound quality.  OGG Vorbis files, MP3’s, WMA’s and Apple’s M4P’s or AAC’s all can sound pretty bad.  If you are starting a recording project, you want to start with the best quality audio that’s possible.  The following guidelines are intended to help people avoid releasing crappy sounding music.  Mix down your instrumentals using the following suggestions as a guide.

  1. Use full-quality uncompressed digital audio like WAV or AIFF files.  At the very least, these files should be 16 bit 44.1Khz stereo files.  I prefer to work with 24 bit files at either 44.1 Khz or 88.2 Khz.  The quality of the audio is much better and is easier to manipulate.  Using uncompressed files is the best way of ensuring that your engineer will be able to make a great mix of your songs.
  2. If you must use a compressed file-format, use FLAC (the Free Lossless Audio Codec) <http://flac.sourceforge.net/>
    FLAC is great because it is lossless, which means that even though the files are smaller than uncompressed files, they sound just as good as uncompressed files.  By using additional processor power you can make FLAC files even smaller.  In a series of tests that I did with my colleague Connor Smith, we discovered that FLAC was capable of shrinking our test file of uncompressed audio at 5.3 MB down to 1.6 MB without loosing any audio quality at all. FLAC files are sometimes small enough for people to email if they are short.
  3. Give the engineer stems. Stems are separate stereo tracks for each of the instruments in the instrumental.  For instance, you would have separate files for the drums, the bass, the rhythm instruments, the keyboards, the samples.  When you give the engineer stems they are able to mix the different instruments with the vocals.  A lot of the time the instruments block out the vocals in a mix.  If you send stems, the engineer can lower the instruments without lowered the drums and the bass. If you don’t bring stems, the engineer can’t leave the drums loud if the instruments are getting in the way of the vocals.
  4. If you have to use compressed lossy files, use the best possible quality that you can get.  OGG Vorbis, MP3, WMA, and AAC/M4P all offer the option of making higher quality files that are larger in size or smaller files that sound bad.  Here’s the audio choices going from best sounding to worst sounding:Ogg Vorbis (.ogg) is Open Source, Free and Awesome <http://www.vorbis.com/>
    Microsoft’s Windows Media Audio (.wma) <http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/forpros/codecs/audio.aspx>
    Apple’s Advanced Audio Codec (.aac or .m4p) <http://www.apple.com/quicktime/technologies/aac/>
    Mp3 (.mp3) MPEG layer 3 (Motion Picture Engineering Group) <http://lame.sourceforge.net/>
  5. Use the highest bit rate that you can use with all of the above audio formats.  I recommend a minimum bit rate of 256 Kbps for Ogg, WMA and AAC, but a minimum of 320 Kbps for MP3 audio.  VBR or Variable Bit Rate can be a little squirrelly, so to be safe always choose the highest quality option available.
  6. Find out if the engineer has the same software that the beat was created in.  I have FL Studio XXL so I can get FruityLoops files with the loop bundle and mix the  instrumental with the vocals directly.  It’s very likely that your engineer has software that can work with your format.
  7. If the file was ever a compressed file, you can never make the quality better.  For instance, if a beat-maker emails you a beat as an MP3 and you then convert it to a 16bit 44.1 Khz WAV file, it will never sound better than the MP3 file.  Never try to burn a CD with MP3 versions of the music.  You are just making the problem worse.

Please don’t hesitate to ask questions about file formats.  I can also help you to get great mixes either with advice or you can send me your projects to work some magic.

March 13th, 2009

Started working on 5 more baritone guitars!

I have recently started building 5 more baritone guitars under the Indecent brand. All the bodies will be constructed from white ash, but the necks will be laminated from many different woods. I found a great piece of sap-wood walnut which is very strong, but also light-weight. The walnut will be laminated with purple heart like the original prototype neck. I will also be making maple/purple heart and mahogany/purpleheart laminates as well.

Jim Mouradian of Mouradian Guitars has agreed to hang one of the new guitars in his Winchester guitar store. Jim and his son own the business together and manufacturer their own line of gorgeous and innovative guitars and basses. Eddie from Carlino Guitars has also been quite helpful in the process and we probably be selling the instruments as well.

Please let me know if anyone has suggestions for new neck materials!

January 24th, 2009

For NEIA Students: Cheap Alesis HD24 Caddy Options

Alesis HD24 Hard Drive Caddy

Alesis HD24 Hard Drive Caddy

Most of my audio students at the NEIA (the New England Institute of Art) want to know the cheapest way to get an Alesis HD24 caddy for their Recording 1 and Recording 2 classes. Unfortunately you pay for convenience when you shop at the school store, but you can get it cheaper off the web. As per usual you can find the best deal at Amazon right here. At the time of this post, Amazon has it listed at $22.95 via Musician’s Friend. After you order this, you will also need a IDE/PATA drive to stick in it. You won’t need a very big disk for your classes at the Art Institute. Probably anything more than 60 GB will be fine.

Make sure to NOT buy anything that says SATA on it, or anything that says 2.5″.  What you want is a 3.5″ 7200 RPM (IDE or PATA or Ultra ATA) Hard Drive.  You can get one that is boxed or OEM, which is cheaper. Here’s a few inexpensive options:

Western Digital 80 GB IDE 7200 RPM

Western Digital 80 GB IDE 7200 RPM

Seagate 120 GB IDE 7200 RPM Barracuda

Seagate 120 GB IDE 7200 RPM Barracuda

If you are mobile or adventurous you can always go to Microcenter in Cambridge on Memorial Drive to buy your hard drive.  They have great deals and a convenient order-on-the-web and then pick-up at store feature. I really hope that this helps!

HDG XIX

January 24th, 2009

Working in the Studio: BYO External Hard Disk

When I start working with a new studio client at Indecent Music, one of the things that I ask is that each client bring their own high-speed external hard disk.  This allows the artist to keep their own files with them, which gives them the security of a back-up copy should anything happen to their data at the recording studio.  Hard disk failure doesn’t happen very often, but discs are wear-items.  Drives can only keep spinning for so long before they’re going to wear out. The majority of the disk failures happen when a hard drive is spinning up from stationary or spinning down.  If a computer gets hit hard while the drive is spinning the platter (the part of the drive that spins with the data on it) can crash against the stationary parts of the drive. After this happens, the only people that can retrieve your data are pro’s that have a clean-room to work in.  It’s incredibly expensive to get your data at that point and sometimes it’s still impossible.

There are a bunch of manufacturers out there that make external drives, but most of them are not designed to deal with the kind of data transfer that audio (and video!) production requires.  The industries first big manufacturer is Glyph [http://www.glyphtech.com/], which makes hard drive especially for the audio and video industries.  There is no question that Glyph does make some of the best gear out there and they do have a great warranty which is for 3-years with a 1-year overnight replacement clause.  They also have a fantastic basic data recovery service for FREE for the first two years that you own your drive.  There are no guaranties that they will recover your data, of course, but this is better than what the competition offers by far.  Many Glyph hard drives have also been certified to work with Digidesign software which includes ProTools. The downside is that the drives sell for about double the cost of other comparable drives.  You are paying for the name and for the data recovery service.  The best versions of the Glyph drives are as follows:

Glyph PortaGig 320 GB External Hard Drive

Glyph PortaGig 320 GB External Hard Drive

Glyph Technologies

Glyph Technology 500GB Quad Desktop Hard Drive

All Glyph Technology Products

Glyph was the original for-audio drive manufacturer, but they are not the only game in town.  The major advantage to the Glyph systems is the Oxford chip which is the brains of the hard-drive enclosure.  Oxford is pretty much thought to be the best company for many chips that interface an external SATA hard disk to a computer via eSATA, Firewire 400/800 and USB 2.0.

Another company call Icy Dock also makes a fantastic hard drive enclosure line that allows you to put your own hard drives into the enclosure.  This means that you can buy the same drives that Glyph uses (Seagate Barracuda’s) and utilize an Oxford chip without paying a lot of extra dough.  To get a complete package, you simply buy an enclosure (like a Icy Dock MB559US-1S External Enclosure or a Icy Dock MB664US-1SB Screwless External Enclosure) and then you just buy a hard disk.

Icy Dock MB559US-1S External Hard Disk Enclosure

Icy Dock External Hard Disk Enclosure (MB559US-1S)

Icy Dock Screwless Hard drive enclosure (MB664US-1SB)

Icy Dock Screwless Hard drive enclosure (MB664US-1SB)

Seagate Barracuda 7200 RPM 500GB SATA Internal Hard Drive

Seagate Barracuda 7200 RPM 500GB SATA Internal Hard Drive

spacer
These Seagate Barracuda drives are extremely quiet at 28 dB idle and 35 dB writing and they have fantastic shock resistance of 63 Gs while in operation. These are the same discs that Glyph uses, so they’re A-O.K.

If you have any questions about other types of drives, leave a comment and let me know!

January 23rd, 2009

What books do I need for Survey of Music Technology at UML?

As many of you already know, I am now teaching at two colleges: University of Massachusetts Lowell and the New England Institute of Art.  At both schools I teach in the Audio Production departments, but at UML, it is called SRT or Sound Recording Technology. I can recommend both of the text books.  They have different perspectives and both are well established texts in the field.

The first book that is required reading for UML’s  class 78.305 “Survey of Music Technology” is Experiencing Music Technology by David Williams and Peter Webster.  The book is quite expensive in stores, but is a little cheaper at Amazon as usual. A new edition of the book has just become available to update the content with internet technologies, contro surfaces and other innovations from the last 10 years.

Experiencing Music Technology Book

Experiencing Music Technology

The second book is also expensive unfortunately. Audio in Mediais in its 8th edition and is one of the most updated books on the subject. This text covers everything from acoustics to post-production. It’s fantastic overview of music technology from mics and loudspeakers to control surfaces and signal processors.


Audio in Media Book

Audio in Media

January 21st, 2009

The Best Vise for Electronic Projects: Panavise 350

Panavise Model 350 Electronics Vise

Panavise Model 350 Electronics Vise

One of the the most important tools on your workbench is your vise.  Without a strong, stable support for your work you will spend hours knocking over junior size vises or “helping-hands” alligator-clip toys. My personal favorite vise is the Panavise 350 [Panavise.com] shown to the left.

The 350 is actually 3 products shipped as a single product. First you get the heavy-duty base, the Panavise 312.  It weighs 2 pounds by itself and at 8 ½ inches wide you won’t be able to tip this baby over. It comes with nice rubber feet to help keep it from sliding and you can mount all of the Pro (300 and series) mounts as well as the Jr. (201) mounts.

Next is the standard 300 base which can hold all of the vise jaws that you could possibly want. It weighs in at 1 ½ lbs, which adds a good deal of stability in itself.

The 350 also comes with the Model 376 self-centering extra-wide jaws!  These jaws have a number of really convenient features.  First the vise is opened and closed with a rotating handle with ball bearings.  You can open or close very quickly without having to take your hand off the handle.  The jaws are reversible so you can hold small items or PCB as big as 9 inches across.  The neoprene jaw pads are grooved to hold your boards and they are replaceable if they should ever wear out.  The Panavise 350 comes with a lifetime warranty also, so no worries about quality here.

Amazon.com has the best deal on the PanaVise 350 Multi-Purpose Work Center which is $69.50 at the time of this posting.

January 17th, 2009

Designing a Baritone Guitar (Part III)

To the reader:

The following posts are part of a project that I completed in December of 2008 in which I designed and built a baritone guitar.  I looked at existing designs and tried to correct the problems that I found with the available commercial production instruments.  The end result was a great guitar that exceeded my aesthetic expectations and met my utilitarian requirements.  The original paper from the project is 40 pages long, so I am breaking the work up into installments. Please note that the design of the guitar, the shape of the body, the neck and the headstock are all trademarks of Indecent Music. I do not consent to my ideas being used for commercial purposes, but I would be happy to talk to or help anyone that is interested in building an instrument for themselves. I am reviewing my options for Patents and the design of the instrument should be considered protected by the Patent Pending status.  Thanks so much for your interest!

Hendrik David Gideonse XIX

4 Designing the Baritone Guitar

Based on my experiences with the production models that I tried, I resolved to design an instrument that did not fall prey to the pitfalls mentioned above.  I would optimize the scale length and string gauges to provide for a firm but comfortable amount of string tension.  Learning from bass designs, I would shift the strings towards the tail of the instrument by moving the bridge away from the neck and closer to the tail.

4.1 Woods, Tone and Rigidity

Electric guitars are nearly always made of hardwoods from a small number of  deciduous species from around the world.  Acoustic instruments, however, use resonating tops made of coniferous species like spruce and cedar.  The most popular woods for electric guitar building are rock maple (also known as hard or sugar maples), mahogany (a tropical exotic hardwood native to the West Indies, Central and South America), alder, swamp/white ash (both native to North America), or rosewood and ebony (both exotic hardwoods becoming hard to find).
Each of these woods has its own tonal characteristics as well as grain type, grain figure, hardness and rigidity.  According to Warmoth Direct Guitars [14], mahogany is the warmest of the neck woods, while maple is the brightest with the most defined high frequencies.  Honduran mahogany is the wood used for Gibson guitars’ necks and bodies, while hard maple is the wood typically used in Fender necks.  Body woods are often slightly less dense and softer to allow for a lighter instrument.  Swamp ash, which is very popular with Fender bodies, is a softer, lighter variety compared to Northern hard ash which is harder and heavier.  Alder, basswood and poplar are all slightly softer woods commonly used in body construction as well [15].
I opted to use swamp ash for the body because it would cut down on the weight of the instrument and would still provide a tone in between the warmth of mahogany and the brightness of maple.  Ash has a natural rustic feel to it, even when sanded with 200 grit paper and it is an open-grained wood, which means the grain has deep pores that must be filled in order to get a smooth finish.

Figure 8 A close-up of swamp ash grain
A close-up of swamp ash grain

For the neck, I chose rock maple, which unlike swamp ash, has a closed grain and can be sanded almost as smooth as a polished rock or buffed steel. The neck is the part of the instrument that will be touched the most, and the feel of this critical part affects the player’s impression of the instrument as a whole.  I also used purpleheart in the lamination of the neck blank mostly because of its striking color, but also to tone down the brightness of the maple.

The fingerboard is glued to the top of the neck over the truss rod and the frets are pressed into the fingerboard.  I chose to make the fingerboard from macassar ebony which is a figured ebony with visible grain varying from black to browns and tans.
The lamination technique that I used is very similar to the style shown on the Ibanez bass above.  I ripped three pieces of hard maple to ¾” by 1” and 2 pieces of purpleheart to ¾” by ¼” and then glued all five of the pieces together as shown in Figure 10.  I made sure that I reversed the grain pattern for each piece to try to create the most stable neck blank possible.  The notch cut down the length of the neck for the truss rod is centered on the middle piece of maple, so that the truss rod will not disrupt the various laminations.

Figure 9 A close-up of purpleheart and hard maple
A close-up of purpleheart and hard maple

Figure 10 5-piece neck blank lamination method with 3 1” pieces of rock maple and 2 ¼” pieces of purpleheart.
5-piece neck lamination method

4.2 Angled Headstock and ‘V’ Neck Contour

The shape of the neck is another critical part of the design process that affects string tension, sustain and the feel of the instrument.  The traditional method of the headstock configuration is the angled back headstock used in all string instruments from lutes, violins and viols, as well as guitars.  This angle increases the pressure of the strings on the string nuts and eliminates the use of a string tree to hold the string down onto the headstock as required by the Fender instruments.  Angles from 10° to 15° are common and I opted for 15° as it was an easy multiple of 90°.

Figure 11 A 3D rendering of the neck blank with a 15° angled headstock and radiused fingerboard
3-D rendering of the neck blank

Figure 12 A different angle of the neck blank before carving with guides to show where the frets will be installed
A different angle of the neck blank

The neck back contour is the shape of the neck as cut laterally through the neck.  Historically guitars have used either a ‘C’ or a ‘U’ shape, but Fender pioneered the ‘V’ neck shape which optimizes the player’s ability to wrap his or her thumb round the neck of the instrument.  The ‘V’ has been popular particularly with blues and country musicians. It makes playing open chords easier and more comfortable and is particularly useful for instruments with a longer scale like basses and baritones.

Figure 13 A comparison of the standard ‘C’ neck contour (black) with two more ‘V’ shaped contours [16]
Comparison of neck contours

I chose to use a slightly stronger ‘V’ shape than the two designs above because I was planning on tapering from the ‘V’ at the first fret to the flatter ‘C’ shaped neck by the 12th fret to make it easier to play single notes and bar chords.  The Figure below shows the shape of the neck at the first fret.

Figure 14 The neck contour for the baritone at the 1st fret
Neck contour for the baritone at the 1st fret

4.3 Headstock Shapes

My design goal for the headstock was to use the least amount of wood possible, but still allow the strings to remain straight as they travel from the nut to the tuning machines.  A smaller headstock weighs less and does not affect the balance of the guitar as much as a larger headstock.
The three-top, three-bottom (3+3) traditional symmetrical headstock used on early acoustic instruments and later adopted by Gibson, causes the strings to bend outward from the nut to the tuning spindle on the tuning machine.  This can lead to problems of the string binding at the nut and intermittently slipping, causing tuning problems and unnecessary string breakage.  The 3+3 style headstock is more user-friendly however, in that it is easier to feel which machine the player is tuning on dark stages while still maintaining eye contact with the audience or the panel of a digital tuner.
The design goal of a small headstock, in the 3+3 configuration, is difficult to achieve because the tuning machines on a symmetrical headstock bump into each other if they’re not offset.   This is further complicated by the desire to maintain a straight angle from the string from the nut to the winder.  Figure 15 below shows the many different iterations of the headstock that I went through to find a design that was both visually appealing and effective at maintaining straight string runs while allowing for the tuning machines not to touch.  The center and lower right mockups became the actual headstock in my design.

Figure 15 Various iterations of headstock designs from the earliest to the latest
Various iterations of the headstock designs

The first prototype of the headstock was the upper left model.  The symmetry was appealing, but the tuning machines would not fit so close together on the top holes, for strings 3 and 4. The second version to the right offset locations of the machines slightly, but the tuning machines still butted against each other.  The next two designs, upper right and bottom left, solved the issue of tuning machine spacing, but they were quite unattractive.  Figure 16 below shows the final contour of the tuning machines super-imposed through the surface of the headstock.

Figure 16 The final headstock design with tuning machines super-imposed on surface.
The final headstock design

The final design offset the machines substantially and added the style of an inverted Fender shape to balance the large hips on the body of the instrument.  The final touch is the purpleheart cover over the truss-rod adjustment notch.  The headstock was successful both in the elimination of extra bends in the string and in providing aesthetic balance to the instrument.

Figure 17 Photo of the baritone’s headstock from the front
A photo of the baritone's headstock from the front

Figure 18 Photo of the baritone’s headstock from the back
A photo of the headstock from the back

4.4  Joining the Neck to the Body

The neck joint is the critical connection through which vibrations travel from the nut to the bridge of the instrument.  A poor neck joint will decrease vibrations and reduce the volume and sustain of notes as well as causing an unstable playing experience.  The worst example of this is a bolt-on type neck where the neck pocket is routed too largely for the neck, allowing the player to torque the screws loose while playing.  Over time this could lead to the screws or even the neck breaking.
There are three joint options for the custom guitar builder: bolt-on (actually uses screws), mortise and tenon glued or set neck, and neck-through where the neck continues all the way through the body of the instrument.
The bolt-on neck is the simplest method of attachment and also the least expensive, but is rarely used for custom guitars. The advantages of the bolt-on neck include non-destructive neck replacement and faster manufacturing because gluing time is eliminated.  The primary disadvantage is that the bolt-on connection is often not as rigid as a set-neck or a neck through design, which are said to have increased sustain due to the improved mechanical connection between the body and the neck.  The vast majority of bolt-on necks use Fender’s original measurements for the neck pocket: 2 3/16” wide, 3” long and 5/8” deep.
The second type of neck joint is the mortise and tenon, also known as the set neck.  In short, this is a glued neck joint that uses increased surface area to create a stronger connection between the neck and the body.  The mortise is the neck pocket and the tenon (the end of the neck) is inserted into the mortise.  Great care is taken to ensure that the joint has a high tolerance and that the joint will hold simply with pressure before the joint is glued.
This particular style of joint has been used to connect necks on string instrument bodies for hundreds of years.  Instruments in the viol, violin, and classical guitar families all share the same neck join, which also includes the subset of the dove-tail neck joint.  The classical guitars have a neck that is parallel to the top of the body, while the violin family has necks that tilt back from the face of the instrument.  This angle increases the pressure on the bridge of the instrument and thus improves the length of the sustain of the instrument.  The tilt-back angle (usually 2° To 3°) of the neck requires a taller bridge to prevent the string action from being too low.
In addition to the neck angle, often this style of guitar includes an angled headstock as well.  The angle serves to increase the pressure of the strings on the nut and eliminates the need for a string tree to hold the strings down to work well with the tuning machines.  A great example of this type of guitar in the Gibson Les Paul, which is a solid body guitar that borrows heavily from the look of arch-topped hollow body instruments like violins and viols.
The third style of guitar neck joint is the neck-through style.  This construction technique actually is not a neck joint at all.  The wood of the neck continues through the body of the guitar in one continuous piece.  Les Paul’s “Log” guitar was probably the first neck-through instrument.  This type of design was originally found more often in electric basses than in guitars, but now many models of both are available.  Body wings are attached to the neck core to obtain the traditional shape of the guitar.  The pickups and bridge all are mounted into the neck piece, which contributes to increased sustain.
Most neck-through instruments do not have the angled back neck that requires a higher bridge.  This may counteract the improved sustain of the neck-through design by decreasing pressure on the bridge and nut of the instrument.  The neck-through body design is more complicated to build and manufacture than either the bolt-on or set neck styles.  As a result, most neck-through designs come from higher-end instrument manufacturers and small custom luthier shops.
I chose the mortise and tenon set-neck option because I was interested in an extremely strong rigid joint, but did not want to give up the warmth of a full swamp ash body.  In my design (see Figure 19 below), I allowed for a neck width of 2 3/16,” but during construction opted for a slightly wider neck at the body around 2 5/16.”  In the Figure below you can see both the routing for the neck to fit into the instrument and the template on the left that was used as a guide to route the pocket accurately.

Figure 19 A router template and the neck pocket routed out of the body
A router template and the neck pocket routed out of the body

Figure 20 A 3-D view of the baritone body showing the neck pocket dimensions
3-D rendering of the baritone body

4.5 Body Shape

The body of the guitar makes up the bulk of the size and weight of the instrument and is the part of the instrument that rests against the body and determines the balance of the instrument, both in seated and standing positions.
I designed my instrument with the traditional 20 frets to avoid the need for a large cut-away.  I positioned the bridge of the instrument towards the tail to move the entire length of the strings to the right, bringing the first position closer to me.  I also created a full-sized top horn to position the top strap button at the 11th fret ensuring a comfortable playing position even with a longer neck of 27 ½.”
The unusual body carving has given the baritone its distinctive look.  Some of the carving is merely ornamental, like the ‘S’ curve connecting the top horn to the bottom hip of the guitar, but other features of the carving are designed to make it easier or more comfortable to play.
The cut-away that allows access to the higher frets is a good example of a functional carving.  By streamlining the edges of the instrument and thinning the body at the cut-away, I have improved access to the frets that normally would be difficult.
Another functional carving technique is called the tummy cut (see Figure 18), which removes wood where the player’s belly presses into the instrument.  This allows the instrument to feel like it is wrapping around the performer, and removes wood to decrease the weight of the instrument.  In addition, the top hip of the guitar is contoured to allow the arm to rest on the instrument without hitting a sharp corner of the instrument’s body.  Both the tummy cut and the arm rest cut were pioneered by Fender with the sleek modern design of the Stratocaster.

Figure 21 An example of a tummy cut on the back of a guitar body [17]
An example of a tummy cut on the back of a guitar body

Figure 22 Front of the body of the baritone
The front of the baritone

Figure 23 Back view of the baritone’s body and heel
The back of the baritone's body and heel

Several guitars influenced the shape that I designed: the Parker Fly, Prince’s Cloud Guitar from the end of the 1980’s and the 000 Auditorium style guitars made by C.F. Martin.  The shape of the Martin 000 has been a staple of American instruments for the past century.  The smaller size body is very comfortable both to wear with a strap or to rest on a leg because of the depth and location of the so-called waist of the body.  I used the bottom hips and the waist contour from the 000 guitar as the beginning of the shape of the baritone guitar (See Figure 24).

Figure 24 C.F. Martin’s 000 14 fret Guitar Body Shape used for the “hips” of the baritone body.  From the left to the right: Martin 000 [18], a 000 14-fret body mold [19], the borrowed shaped for the baritone.
000 body comparisons

Figure 25 The Parker Fly, probably the last major innovation in commercially available guitars
The Parker Fly

The contoured shape of the Parker Fly was also an inspiration for the body of the baritone.  The Fly has a dramatically rounded arm rest which effectively shaves a lot of material off to lighten the instrument in addition to making it more comfortable to play.   I also spread the tapered armrest across the entire top hip of the instrument to reduce weight and make playing the instrument more comfortable (See Figure 22).
Prince’s Cloud Guitar was another influence on the design of the body.  This was the first guitar I had seen with an exaggerated top horn that moved the strap button towards the nut of the guitar.  I suspect that this innovation would have made it easier for Prince, with his shorter arm length, to reach the lower positions on the neck.  Prince was the first artist, that I was aware of, who had special guitars made for him to meet his needs both from an ergonomic and aesthetic point of view.

Figure 26 Prince’s Cloud Guitar at the Rock ‘n’ Roll Hall of Fame
Prince's Cloud Guitar

4.6 Pickup Types and Locations

There are a wide variety of pick-ups in use by manufacturers of baritones, with most instruments being targeted towards certain types of music.  Instruments using single-coil lipstick pickups are targeted at the country-western and roots rock genre, while instruments with double coil pickups are targeted toward hard rock and metal.  The traditional baritone sound used in spaghetti westerns, surf rock and country music comes from baritones equipped with single coil, twangy sounding pickups.
I chose to use a humbucking version of Gibson’s famous P-90 soap-bar pickups because I wanted the bright and growling tone of a single coil, but without the associated hum from a single coil P-90.  Seymour Duncan carries a “stacked” P-90 (Figure 28) that positions the second coil beneath the first so it is not visible and influences the sound only minimally.  I placed the pickups on the body so that the pole-pieces of the neck pickup were beneath the 24th fret position and the bridge pickup was beneath the 36th fret position [20]. (See Figure 27)

Figure 28 Seymour Duncan P-90 Stack Pickups
Seymore Duncan P-90 Stack pickups

Figure 27 Baritone body design using fret locations as measurements for pickup placement
Rendering of baritone's body using fret locations to determine pickup locations

These two locations offer a much richer viewpoint to the nodes and anti-nodes of the harmonics of the string.   The string vibrates the least at the nodes and vibrates the most at the anti-nodes.  In addition, the location of the nodes and anti-nodes change as the player shortens the string length by fretting notes.  Generally, pickups closer to the neck have a deeper sound and pickups near the bridge have a brighter sound.  Gibson named the pickups, Rhythm and Lead, to suggest that the bridge pickup would be better for solos, while the rhythm pickup would be better for chords and accompaniment.

5 Conclusion

I created a new guitar design to improve on existing production baritone guitars and to correct problems with the instruments’ balance, rigidity, tone and ergonomics.  The most significant innovation was to change the balance of the instrument by moving the bridge down the guitar to the tail of the instrument and ensuring that the strap button on the top horn of the body is above the 11th fret on the instrument.  This change brings the first position on the instrument closer to the player and improves the ease of playing close to the nut.
The shape of the neck returns to the ‘V’ neck, which makes it easier to hold the instrument comfortably when playing open chords.  As the neck gets closer to the body of the instrument, the back of the neck becomes flatter, making is easier to finger bar-chords.
The neck is laminated from 6 pieces of wood: a macassar ebony fingerboard, three thick layers of hard maple and two thin layers of purpleheart, in order to improve the sustain and tone of the instrument.  The lamination improves the rigidity of the instrument and so it improves the length of time that the guitar vibrates after being plucked.
The pickup pole pieces fall beneath the 24th fret position and the 36th fret position, which are active harmonic locations.  This improves the electric tone of the instrument.  I will continue to make improvements to the guitar in hopes of creating a high-quality production instrument.

References
[14] “Guitar Neck Woods.” Warmoth.com. 2006. Warmoth Direct Guitars. 8 Dec. 2008 <http://www.warmoth.com/guitar/necks/necks.cfm?fuseaction=guitar_neckwoods>.

[15] “Body-Woods.” Warmoth.com. 2006. Warmoth Direct Guitars. 8 Dec. 2008 <http://www.warmoth.com/guitar/options/options_bodywoods.cfm>.

[16] “Back Contours.” WarmothDirect.com. 2006. Warmoth Direct Guitars. 13 Dec. 2008 <http://www.warmoth.com/guitar/necks/necks.cfm?fuseaction=back_profiles>.

[17] Works Cited
Allparts Licensed by Fender Stratocaster Body Sea Foam Green NEW! Digital image. Ebay.com. Ray’s Custom Shop. 12 Dec. 2008 <http://www.rayscustomshop.com/images/wood/sbf-sg-833-bl.jpg>.

[18] Martin 000-28 Norman Blake Acoustic. Digital image. Fullersguitar.com. Fuller’s Vintage Guitar. 8 Dec. 2008 <http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p312/jermdaddy/martins/normanblake28005.jpg>.

[19] Hall Jr., John F. Martin 000 14 fret building mold. Digital image. Bluescreekguitars.com. Blues Creek Guitars, Inc. 8 Dec. 2008 <http://www.bluescreekguitars.com/catalog/images/000%20(small).jpg>.

[20] Tillman, J. Donald. “Response Effects of Guitar Pickup Position and Width.” Till.com Electronic Music Articles. 17 Oct. 2002. Don Till. 11 Dec. 2008 <http://www.till.com/articles/pickupresponse/index.html>.